Philosophy, Theology, History, Science, Big Questions
  • Homepage
    • Collections of Works By Great Thinkers
    • How To Become A Christian
    • Apologetics: Who Need's It
    • Ask ?'s
    • Introduce a New Topic to Discuss
    • Other Recommended Websites / Reading
    • 12 Pitfalls of the Foolish Apologist
    • Apologetics 101: The Basics
  • Phil. Theology
  • Phil. of Religion
    • Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Objections to the Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Defeaters of Divine Hiddenness
    • Defeaters of the Problem of Evil and Divine Silence
    • More Arguments Against Christian Theism
    • The Problem of Miracles
    • Incompatible Properties Argument
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Molinism
    • Primary Sources On Big Topics In Phil. Of Religion
  • Phil. of Science/Time
    • The Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics
    • Fine-Tuning is a Fact
    • Absolute Beginnings
    • God/Time/Cosmology
    • Scientific Realism
  • Biblical Studies
    • Substantial New Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Substantial Old Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Evolution and Christianity
    • Rethinking Biblical Inspiration (In Progress)
    • The Gospels: Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
    • The Historical Case for the Resurrection >
      • Objections to the Resurrection
  • Scholarly Naturalism
    • Paul Draper
    • J.L. Schellenberg
    • Gregory Dawes

Argument From Evil Has No Power Over A Maximal Anselmian God

2/21/2013

0 Comments

 
maximalgod.pdf
File Size: 44 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Natural Evil & The Metaphysical Necessity Of The Laws Of Nature

2/11/2013

0 Comments

 
1) Interesting Recent Exchange on the Problem of Natural Evil Alexander Bird is known for his work on dispositional essentialism and, relatedly, his arguments for the metaphysical necessity of the laws of nature (a view which is growing in acceptance among philosophers, I might add).

Recently, Bird had an exchange with Michael Bertrand on the problem of natural evil in The Australasian Journal of Philosophy. The exchange is based on some brief remarks at the end of Bird's paper,
"Unexpected A Posteriori Necessary Laws of Nature", Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83:4 (December 2005), pp. 533-548. Bertrand's reply, "God Might Be Responsible for Physical Evil", AJP 87:3 (September 2009), pp. 513-515 can be found here (requires subscription for access), and (the pre-print version of) Bird's rejoinder, "...And Then Again, He Might Not Be", AJP 87(2009), pp. 517-521, can be found here.

I find Bird's reply to the problem of natural evil the most plausible. Unfortunately, as he points out, it comes at a high cost, as it relies on a view according to which the laws of nature are metaphysically necessary, which in turn implies that miracles are metaphysically impossible(!). ---Taken from Ex-Apologist

2) Here is another paper that can be used along the similar lines to Alexander Bird's position except that it would allow for the possibility of miracles. 

a_slightly_different_position_that_allows_for_miracles.pdf
File Size: 133 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Alexander Pruss Responds To Schellenberg's Deductive Version of the Problem of Evil

12/13/2012

0 Comments

 
http://alexanderpruss.blogspot.com/2012/07/schellenberg-deductive-argument-from.html
0 Comments

Richard Otte on Draper's Evidential Argument From Evil & Rowe's Probabilistic Argument

10/22/2012

0 Comments

 
otte.draper.pdf
File Size: 39 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

rowe.pdf
File Size: 891 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Read The Entire Article To Understand This 'Solution' To Infant Suffering

10/2/2012

0 Comments

 
chignell-problem-of-infant-suffering.pdf
File Size: 175 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Here are the facts regarding the quality, quantity, and distribution of evil in the world

6/5/2012

0 Comments

 
http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats
0 Comments

Plantinga's Solution To The Logical Problem Of Evil

4/24/2012

0 Comments

 
fulltext.pdf
File Size: 9 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

whats-so-good-about-moral-freedom.pdf
File Size: 127 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

which_worlds_could_god.pdf
File Size: 3652 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

depravity_sanctity_uncooperative_essences.pdf
File Size: 246 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Otte had an exchange with Plantinga on the latter's famous Free Will Defense (FWD) in a recent issue of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. In Otte's paper, he shows that Plantinga's definition of transworld depravity (TWD) is necessarily false(!). However, Otte goes on to offer an alternative notion that plays a similar role in Plantinga's FWD. Interestingly, Plantinga agrees with Otte's points (Taken from ex-apologist).
otte.twd.pdf
File Size: 85 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

An Extension Of Plantinga's Free Will Defense For Non-Moral Evil by Kenneth Boyce

4/15/2012

0 Comments

 
Summary Excerpts From Kenneth Boyce's Article in Faith and Philosophy:

A weakness in Plantinga’s free will defense, however, is that it does not show that theism is consistent (broadly logically
consistent) with the proposition that there are non-moral evils in the world (i.e., that there obtain morally bad states of affairs for which no creature is morally responsible).  But many of us do believe that there are evils of that sort.  I show how Plantinga’s free will defense can be extended so as to redress this weakness.

Read More
0 Comments

Quentin Smith: An Atheological Argument From The Law of Predation

3/16/2012

0 Comments

 
an_atheological_argument_from_evil_natural_laws.docx
File Size: 40 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

See my response to the Problem of Social Evil here: http://www.apologeticsinthechurch.com/4/post/2011/12/the-problem-of-social-evil.html

and my response to Paul Draper's Argument involving Evolution and Theism here: http://www.apologeticsinthechurch.com/4/post/2011/11/natural-selection-and-the-problem-of-evil.html

and my response to why God would use evolution and whether or not it is cruel and wasteful  here: http://www.apologeticsinthechurch.com/27/post/2012/01/isnt-evolution-evil-and-wasteful.html
0 Comments

Quentin Smith: A Sound Logical Problem of Evil & Reply by Alexander Pruss

3/16/2012

2 Comments

 
smith-a-sound-logical-argument-from-evil.pdf
File Size: 148 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Alexander Pruss' Response:
pruss-the-essential-divine-perfection-objection-to-the-free-will-defence.pdf
File Size: 99 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

See my response here: http://www.apologeticsinthechurch.com/27/post/2011/06/response-to-paradox-for-soul-building-theodicy.html
2 Comments
<<Previous

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed