Philosophy, Theology, History, Science, Big Questions
  • Homepage
    • Collections of Works By Great Thinkers
    • How To Become A Christian
    • Apologetics: Who Need's It
    • Ask ?'s
    • Introduce a New Topic to Discuss
    • Other Recommended Websites / Reading
    • 12 Pitfalls of the Foolish Apologist
    • Apologetics 101: The Basics
  • Phil. Theology
  • Phil. of Religion
    • Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Objections to the Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Defeaters of Divine Hiddenness
    • Defeaters of the Problem of Evil and Divine Silence
    • More Arguments Against Christian Theism
    • The Problem of Miracles
    • Incompatible Properties Argument
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Molinism
    • Primary Sources On Big Topics In Phil. Of Religion
  • Phil. of Science/Time
    • The Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics
    • Fine-Tuning is a Fact
    • Absolute Beginnings
    • God/Time/Cosmology
    • Scientific Realism
  • Biblical Studies
    • Substantial New Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Substantial Old Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Evolution and Christianity
    • Rethinking Biblical Inspiration (In Progress)
    • The Gospels: Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
    • The Historical Case for the Resurrection >
      • Objections to the Resurrection
  • Scholarly Naturalism
    • Paul Draper
    • J.L. Schellenberg
    • Gregory Dawes

Identical Twin Theory

12/29/2011

2 Comments

 
The Nag Hammadi "sayings" Gospel of Thomas begins: "These are the secret sayings that the living Jesus spoke and Didymos Judas Thomas recorded." Syrian tradition also states that the apostle's full name was Thomas. Some have seen in the Acts of Thomas (written in east Syria in the early 3rd century, or perhaps as early as the first half of the 2nd century) an identification of Saint Thomas with the apostle Judas brother of James, better known in English as Jude. However, the first sentence of the Acts follows the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles in distinguishing the apostle Thomas and the apostle Judas son of James. Few texts identify Thomas' other twin, though in the Book of Thomas the Contender, part of the Nag Hammadi library, it is said to be Jesus himself: "Now, since it has been said that you are my twin and true companion, examine yourself…"
Jesus had an unknown identical twin that impersonated Jesus after stealing Jesus' body from the tomb.  Moreover, the parents of Jesus and his twin brother never knew that the real baby (the twin) got accidentally switched with another baby.  Thus, Jesus' twin brother grew up independently of him.
Criticism of Identical Twin Theory

Apart from the fact that this attribution of Jesus as having a twin is so far removed from the original life of Jesus as to be legendary, and the notion of twin in the Book of Thomas the Contender may be 'spiritual,' or 'relational,' and not biological, let's assume that Jesus really had a twin. 

1) It has weak explanatory scope because it has to conjoin itself to a hallucination hypothesis in order to account for the post-mortem appearances of Jesus.

2) It has weak explanatory power.  It cannot explain the supernatural aspects of the appearances, namely, they had a numinous aspect, they weren’t earthly (every New Testament Scholar agrees on the properties of these appearances).  Moreover, the wounds of the crucifixion are also an aspect that the identical twin hypothesis cannot explain.  These aspects are independently attested and part of the evidence to be explained, and are accepted by most historians.  In addition, it cannot adequately explain the origin of the disciples belief in a resurrected Jesus.  It seems wild to suppose that Jesus' disciples wouldn't notice a difference in Jesus' twin because Jesus was radically unique in terms of his teachings, character, and actions

3) It is very implausible.  An accidental switch of babies is very implausible because Jesus was either born in solitude in a stable or else, in the stable under the one roof of a Palestinian home.  In the first case, there were no other babies around, and in the second case, Mary and Joseph were under the care of the relatives who owned the home.  Judaism had no notion of a crucified Messiah, or a resurrected individual prior to the end of the world, and Jesus’ crucifixion meant he was cursed.  But, on the twin theory, Jesus’ twin goes to Jerusalem to satisfy his curiosity upon hearing about his twin brother, he arrives just as Jesus is being crucified, and being an unethical guy he then conceives the idea of hoaxing Jesus’ resurrection.  However, you would have to be a moron to want to go around impersonating someone who the Jews had just crucified for being a heretic, and for who the Romans had crucified for treason.  The main point however, is that is would never occur to Jesus’ twin to hoax a resurrection.

In addition, the kind of tomb Jesus was buried in would have been sealed with a very heavy slab of stone that one man alone couldn’t move.  But, if Jesus' twin couldn't move the slab, then he couldn't steal the body which means that the tomb wouldn't have been empty for any natural reason.  And if there was no empty tomb, then a belief in a Resurrected Messiah would never have arisen.

4)  It is outrageously ad hoc.  There is absolutely no evidence to think that Jesus had a twin brother, that Mary wasn’t Jesus mother, that Jesus’ twin grew up apart from him, that Jesus’ twin was unethical, that Jesus’ brother learned he had a twin, that he came to Jerusalem just as Jesus was being crucified, that he wanted to hoax a resurrection. 

5) It is disconfirmed by accepted beliefs.  It is universally accepted that Jesus was the biological son of Mary and had no identical twin.

TAKEN FROM THE DEBATE WLC HAD WITH GREG CAVIN
2 Comments
Jude
5/28/2016 05:37:21 pm

Is it possible to have one parents dna in you ? Just female dna? Serious question?

Reply
Erica
8/17/2021 12:43:19 pm

Jesus looks girl here and looks boy out. Everyone knows that he is brothers with Lucifer. God said Lucifer and Jesus are half identical twins. They share the same father David or Jospeh but they have different mothers. The mother of Lucifer is Mary and the mother of Jesus was God, who was a girl then. Then both brothers were set as moons. Lucifer as the moon here Jerusalem that will get thrown out of heaven by Jesus who comes dressed as a girl at the second coming, and takes the moon by its hand and throws it down. Then Lucifer calls itself Zeus or God of thunder but it has no power and does not run this universe, Jesus does. Jesus is also called lighting, lightning and thunder are twins to each other. But lightning comes first, At the second coming which will happen anyday. Both sides have been going from county to country. ,Jesus the son becomes the bride of God when it 69s wiht its mother God and it becomes the mother and God becomes its son. For eternal marriage they both live for temporary as each other as they build a family together. They do this with a third and that’s the Holy Ghost, Now it’s the end of time and when Lucifer or Meghan Markle saw that she was not with God, but David or Abraham the Devil the head of the animal kingdom not not the kingdom the kingdom of God, a kingdom means heart, then she offered herself to God but he rejected her and said he would only chose his firstborn Jesus. Prince Charles is Mary Magdeline at night Venus. They have lived many lives together stealing body after body. But this time Jesus woke up from being dead on the ground all this time, living as nothing and saw the mark in the sky and knew someone had been raised about it. It will rise alone with all its children against the children of Abraham the Devil and take everyone who is false and take its children to their new home in Paradise that we have been building for five years now. This universe is terminal and it will happen any day.,

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed