Philosophy, Theology, History, Science, Big Questions
  • Homepage
    • Collections of Works By Great Thinkers
    • How To Become A Christian
    • Apologetics: Who Need's It
    • Ask ?'s
    • Introduce a New Topic to Discuss
    • Other Recommended Websites / Reading
    • 12 Pitfalls of the Foolish Apologist
    • Apologetics 101: The Basics
  • Phil. Theology
  • Phil. of Religion
    • Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Objections to the Arguments for the Existence of God
    • Defeaters of Divine Hiddenness
    • Defeaters of the Problem of Evil and Divine Silence
    • More Arguments Against Christian Theism
    • The Problem of Miracles
    • Incompatible Properties Argument
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Molinism
    • Primary Sources On Big Topics In Phil. Of Religion
  • Phil. of Science/Time
    • The Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics
    • Fine-Tuning is a Fact
    • Absolute Beginnings
    • God/Time/Cosmology
    • Scientific Realism
  • Biblical Studies
    • Substantial New Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Substantial Old Testament Puzzles (In Progress)
    • Evolution and Christianity
    • Rethinking Biblical Inspiration (In Progress)
    • The Gospels: Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
    • The Historical Case for the Resurrection >
      • Objections to the Resurrection
  • Scholarly Naturalism
    • Paul Draper
    • J.L. Schellenberg
    • Gregory Dawes

Isn't It UnChristian to Defend the Resurrection Using Historical 'Proofs' Since Jesus Upbraids Doubting Thomas For Seeking 'Proof?'

2/1/2012

0 Comments

 
WLC: I think that the reason Jesus upbraids Thomas in that story is taht Thomas falied to believe on the basis of the apostolic testimony that Jesus was risen.  Jesus is not saying, 'Thomas, it's bleesed to make irrational leaps of faith.'  he's saying, 'You should have beleived on the basis of the credible testimony of the other apostles, the eyewitnesses, that I was risen.'  Similarly, John's readers, though geographically or chronologically removed from the events of the empty tomb and the resurrection appearances, ought to believe on the basis of the apostolic testimony recorded in John's Gospel that Jesus is risen fromt he dead.  Thus, it is John's point of view that we have adequate apostolic testimony to the resurrection of Jesus; and we can confidently believe on that basis, even though we ourselves haven't seen an appearance of Jesus or discovered an empty tomb.  It's in the conclusion in that John says that these signs are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and have life through his name (John 20:30-31).  That comes on the heels of the Thomas story, and it in effect says that what Thomas failed to do was to believe what the other disciples had told him.  Thus, it is perfectly in line with Jesus' upbraiding Thomas that he should have believed on the basis of the 'secondhand' apostolic testimony for Christians today to construct a historical case on the basis of that same testimony.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed