Significant Works That Answer 'Yes':
http://www.amazon.com/How-Earth-Did-Jesus-Become/dp/0802828612/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357344695&sr=1-2&keywords=larry+hurtado

http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-God-Israel-Testaments-Christology/dp/0802845592/ref=pd_sim_b_2

Significant Works That Would Want To Qualify The Above Two Works A Bit:
http://www.amazon.com/Did-First-Christians-Worship-Jesus/dp/0664231969/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357344843&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=james+dg+dunn+did+the+first

http://www.amazon.com/King-Messiah-Son-God-Literature/dp/0802807720/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357344891&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=yarbro+collins+royal+messiah

http://www.amazon.com/Forgery-Counterforgery-Literary-Christian-Polemics/dp/0199928037/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1356637662&sr=1-5&keywords=bart+ehrman

The main worry this book should raise for a Christian I think has to do with ONE PARTICULAR theory of inspiration commonly known as the plenary, verbal, and confluent theory of inspiration which entails inerrancy.  In particular, this book would be a falsification of that THEORY OF INSPIRATION.  Becoming convinced that the NT contains a forgery or two or three shouldn't cause a Christian to abandon their worldview then (i.e. God exists, Jesus is the Messiah, Jesus was resurrected, etc.), it should simply cause a Christian to adjust their theory of inspiration.  (See my re-thinking Biblical Inspiration Section)

http://www.amazon.com/Paul-Follower-Jesus-Founder-Christianity/dp/0802801242/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1356637022&sr=1-1&keywords=david+wenham+paul

Shorter, popular version of the above book:
http://www.amazon.com/Did-Paul-Get-Jesus-Right/dp/0745962483/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1356637082&sr=1-3&keywords=david+wenham+paul